WE MOVED!

Thanks for visiting Cardinal Diamond Diaries. If you our finding our site for the first time or returning after a break, please check out our NEW location at DiamondDiaries.net

Monday, August 30, 2010

Colby Rasmus is (not?) JD Drew

I don't want to talk about the team today. I did plenty of that yesterday over at i70baseball, and everything I said then still stands - the team needs to quit playing at the level of their opponent.

Based on the title, you can see I've been bouncing around an idea in my head. It started yesterday morning, when I saw that someone (I apologize that I do not remember who or where) had made a statement to the extent of 'perhaps Colby Rasmus is becoming somewhat of a JD Drew type.' I almost spilled my cereal because I was upset at just the thought of that.

Let me rewind for those of you that need a refresher course: Drew was drafted in the 1st round of the 1997 draft by the Phillies, but did not sign, instead choosing to play in the Northern League for a year (I did not know the whole saga about that - now I do). The Cardinals then drafted Drew again in the first round of the 1998 draft, and he did sign (For those that want to know, yes, his agent is Scott Boras). Drew received an insane bonus of $3 million and major league contract worth $7 million.

Yes, he did appear to be just that good. Drew spent almost no time in the minors and was already in St. Louis for a September cup of coffee by the end of the '98 season. In his rookie year of 1999 he was installed as the center fielder and played in 104 games, putting up a good-but-not-great line of .242/.340/.424. He was projected to be a star. He was supposed to be the next big thing. He had a long way to go.

His 2000 season showed a climb - playing in 135 games and hitting .295/.401/.479, tossing in 18 HR and 57 RBI just for good measure. His next three seasons are where it starts to get painful for me. Drew did not go a full year in St. Louis without landing on the disabled list for one reason or another. Leg, arm, shoulder, whatever... he had it, and it wasn't working the way it was supposed to. Eventually Tony LaRussa quit making excuses and started saying what he really thought. In the book Three Nights in August, Tony is quoted as saying that Drew decided to "settle for 75%" of his talent. Fans turned on Drew, referring to him as 'Nancy Drew,' 'DL Drew' or 'AH (Always Hurt) Drew.' Ouch.

After the 2003 season the Cardinals sent Drew (along with Eli Marrero) packing to Atlanta, in exchange for Jason Marquis, Ray King, and some skinny minor league pitcher named Adam Wainwright (Think the Cards won that deal?). This was the first deal I remember vividly, and I was absolutely excited. Drew is the first player I really just did not like. Support? Yes, I supported him. He wore the birds on the bat. But like Todd Wellemeyer in 2009, I just did not like him. He copped an attitude, was always injured, and just never played up to that star potential, at least not while he was in St. Louis. I spent all of middle school and some of my high school years as well just disliking everything about JD Drew.

I don't want Colby Rasmus to be JD Drew redux.

If it wasn't obvious before yesterday that Colby and LaRussa just do not get along, it is crystal clear now. On his radio show yesterday morning, LaRussa stated that Colby needs to do more than show up - he has to play well. He is streaky, gets homer happy, and sometimes does not play smart baseball. In the same hour TLR made a comparison to Jon Jay, noting that Jay positions himself better in the outfield, takes better routes to the ball, adjusts better to pitchers adjusting to him, and despite Rasmus having better raw talent, Jay is farther along in playing all aspects of the game.

I'm not talking about Jay here, so move past that. Tony is obviously frustrated with Rasmus right now, so much so that after originally listing him in the lineup for yesterday's game, he changed his mind and pulled Colby out, instead shifting Jay over to center, moving Skip Schumaker into right and dropping Aaron Miles in at second. At first when I found out about the switch I had thought it was that Colby was just not quite ready to play yet from his injured calf that has been bothering him for the better part of the last two weeks. It was then passed through Twitter by Matthew Leach and Joe Strauss (among others) that the switch was made because of a manager's decision.

Yikes. That is not a good sign for the young (okay fine, he's the same age as me) center fielder. Now my wheels are spinning. Over the course of two hours, I pondered every possible excuse I could for Colby, then promptly blew holes in every one of them. I didn't want to, but it happened.

  1. Colby spent three+ full years in the minors. For a potential star, that is not too small of a number. If he was that good, three years isn't horrible. However, no college baseball. There's a big jump from high school to the majors. Could a player make that jump in three years? Sure. He obviously did. But LaRussa states over and over again that teaching doesn't happen at the major league level, and Colby seems to still need a bit of training sometimes.
  2. Colby has the skills. His home runs go a long way (I saw his 483' bomb in Kansas City first hand - ridiculously far), he's quick on the bases (yet doesn't steal... WHY?!), he makes some nice catches in the outfield... and he strikes out a lot, has been caught stealing one third of the time, and is currently running in the negatives on zone rating in the outfield.
  3. Colby is a team... okay I can't even finish that one. I don't think he is a team player. I'm starting to feel like he cops an attitude. I understand being frustrated, but after being inserted as a pinch hitter last week after it was made clear by TLR/staff before the game that he was unavailable, Rasmus stated that he didn't know why he was thrust in the game, dropping a lovely, "I just work here," line. The word 'entitlement' was dropped about things like that, and I think I'm starting to agree. Please please PLEASE, do not let me start seeing mentions of Colby faking injuries while trying to get out of the lineup. I don't want that at all.

The opinions are out there. Some argue Colby would be better off with a different manager and consistent playing time. Others think he needs to be sent packing via trade in the offseason. Honestly? Right now I just want him to get healthy and play. He needs to play like he knows how, and do the things he does well. He has yet to arrive in the bigs. His numbers are good-not-great, and he has the potential to be great.

Another thing - Colby, quit waiting for Tony to pat you on the head. It will not happen. Brendan figured it out, and he is finally playing better. Affirmation rocks, but Tony doesn't give it. But whatever happens, please do not turn into another JD Drew.


Thanks to friend of the CDD Bob for bouncing this idea around with me yesterday afternoon. He definitely helped me get the dots connected for this piece. If you haven't read Bob's stuff, head over here to his blog, or look for his premiere post on i70baseball.com tomorrow!
Also, if you want a second opinion on this subject, azruavatar has a different perspective over on Viva El Birdos... link here! Dan Moore also takes a crack at the top five TLR Clubhouse Rifts... not pretty.

4 comments:

  1. Great and thought provoking post as usual, Angela. My thoughts are that Colby would flourish under a different style of manager. He's a small town southern boy, who just doesn't communicate well,is immature and desperately needs guidance and praise.

    He has too many natural skills and talent to throw away. He has shown us some amazing defense and offensive power. He needs someone on the team to take him under his wing and help him. A real clubhouse leader.

    I'm beginning to think the Cards don't have this person. We have lost too many excellent players due to Tony's stubbornness. What Tony said yesterday will certainly not help. If we don't develop Colby, it will be the Cardinal organization's fault.

    I'll save the rest for later. Excellent post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks, and I absolutely agree. The boys need someone to look up to, and don't really have that guy. I still don't get how this team went from having so much potential to having so much drama in just a few months!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent piece, as always. I'm guessing that I felt about as conflicted while reading it as you did while writing it.

    It's a genuine head scratcher, isn't it ? I keep thinking back to that R. Lee Ermey insurance commercial, and suddenly it's not so funny. Like you, I sure hope this all works out. The potential in Rasmus is amazing, and I'd love to see it played out in St. Louis.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Bob! I really don't want this to be a case of needing to relocate before he can shine. He needs to be in the birds on the bat!

    ReplyDelete

avandia lawsuit